Affirmative Action Discrimination And Discrimination

First affirmative action refers to policies offering compensation to groups formerly targeted for discrimination and identified along social cleavages - racial groups in the United States and South Africa, and religious groups in Northern Ireland. Affirmative action is a federally mandated program for federal contractors as it relates to employment. Civil rights result from a series of federal and state civil rights laws and provide protection from discrimination and harassment on a variety of bases, including race, color, national origin, gender, age, disability, religion and veteran status. Diversity can be defined in many ways, including diversity of thought, experiences, and backgrounds. Together, all three can contribute to a more welcoming. Affirmative action helps create a level playing field that gives everyone an equal opportunity to compete for a job and career. It ensures that no person is disadvantaged or treated unfairly during the hiring process because of their race, e thnicity or gender. It is about fairness and justice for all. Who could be against that? â€Å"For federal contractors and subcontractors, affirmative action must be taken by covered employers to recruit and advance qualified minorities, women, persons with disabilities, and veterans. Affirmative actions include training programs, outreach efforts, and other positive steps. These procedures should be incorporated into the company written personnel policies†3333 The affirmative action rules have to beShow MoreRelatedAffirmative Action : Discrimination And Discrimination Essay1143 Words   |  5 PagesWHAT IS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Affirmative action can be described as positive discrimination. It is an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment or education. Affirmative action means taking positive steps to end discrimination, to prevent its recurrence, and to creative new opportunities that were previously denied minorities and women. Affirmative action itself has been defined as any measure, beyond simple termination of a discriminatoryRead MoreAffirmative Action : Discrimination And Discrimination927 Words   |  4 PagesLegally, affirmative action refers to policies offering compensation to groups formerly targeted for discrimination and identified along social cleavages racial groups in the United States and South Africa, and religious groups in Northern Ireland. Affirmative action is also described as a federally mandated program for federal contractors as it relates to employment. Civil Right results from federal and state laws against discrimination. Some groups of people have been discriminated and harassmentRead MoreEssay on Affirmative Action is Discrimination1075 Words   |  5 PagesAffirmative action is wrong and will not help solve the problems minorities face.nbsp; The reason it is wrong is because its discrimination.nbsp; It has no place in todays society in todays society because it does more b ad than good.nbsp; In addition to that most people dont enjoy the presence of affirmative action.nbsp; Also, it appears that affirmative action can actually be detrimental to employees health.nbsp; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;nRead MoreAffirmative Action : Discrimination And Ethnicity Essay1459 Words   |  6 PagesLucia Lopez Intro to Philosophy Professor Gill Affirmative Action In â€Å"Arguing Affirmative Action,† Harvard professor Michael J. Sandel discusses the arguments that have arisen from the entry of affirmative action into practice. Affirmative action refers to admission policies, in this case put into effect by universities, that provide equal access to education for groups that have been historically excluded or underrepresented, such as women and minorities. In his essay, Sandel asks whether itRead MoreWorkplace Discrimination And Affirmative Action2174 Words   |  9 PagesAbstract Discrimination is an issue that has been debated for hundreds of years. It is a subject that is continuously researched and relentlessly looking for resolutions to amend the problems that occur. There are a myriad of types of discrimination but the main focus of this paper is on workplace discrimination and the effects affirmative action has on it. Workplace discrimination transpires when an employee suffers from unfavorable or unfair treatment due to race, religion, gender, sexual orientationRead MoreAffirmative Action is NOT Reverse Discrimination Essay2079 Words   |  9 Pages Affirmative action is not the source of discrimination, but the vehicle for removing the effects of discrimination. The Labor Department report found less than 100 reverse discrimination cases among more than 3,000 discrimination opinions by the U.S. District Court and the Court of Appeal between 1990 and 1994. Discrimination was established in only six cases. The report found that, â€Å"Many of the cases were the result of a disappointed applicant†¦. erroneously assuming that when a woman or minorityRead MoreEssay on Affirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination1010 Words   |  5 PagesAffirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination    When the Civil Rights Bill was being debated on the floor of the Senate, Barry Goldwater predicted that this particular bill might be abused. Herbert Humphrey, however, stated that he would eat every page of the bill if ever it were used to justify discrimination against anybody on account of race or sex. The bill eventually passed and became the Civil Rights Act. From college admissions to government contracts, the Civil Rights Act has been grosslyRead MoreDiscrimination And Sexual Harassment And Affirmative Action1594 Words   |  7 PagesDiscrimination and Sexual Harassment Most companies engage in some type of affirmative action policy. Affirmative actions are policies that are placed to engage in the improvement of underprivileged groups who either currently suffer or have historically suffered from discrimination and equality of opportunity. During our lecture, Dr. Kallfelz stated that affirmative action is a, â€Å"Proactive policy with primary immediate attempt to reform (and long term attempt to prevent and deter) socioeconomicallyRead MoreEssay on Reverse Discrimination and Affirmative Action4000 Words   |  16 PagesReverse Discrimination and Affirmative Action Discrimination in employment has been an issue that has plagued our society throughout history. At the turn of this century it was acceptable to advertise job openings and specifically state that people of a certain race, color, religion, gender, or national origin need not apply. A lot has changed over the last 100 years. The proverbial pendulum has swung in the direction of federal protection of certain people, but the problem now is thatRead MoreAffirmative Action : Discrimination Against Minorities1513 Words   |  7 PagesOthmane Ezzabdi AP Seminar Affirmative Action Affirmative action has been apart of the work environment in America since the 1960s until present time. Its main goal has been to suppress the discrimination against minorities and to give them a fighting chance to succeed in achieving their goal of living the American dream all in an act to counter the inexcusable racism and discrimination that has been inhumanely placed on to the minorities over a century ago in the United States; it will ultimately

The Duty Of Veterans And The Military Field - 1461 Words

I am writing a paper on an issue I have seen a lot being a soldier in the military, and working in the medical field. This is an issue that is very important in the field I would like to be working in when it comes to the veterans and the military. This is something I need to understand and be able to explain to soldiers, veterans, and their families when this issue comes up. What a lot of people do not know is that not everyone currently serving in the military is covered under HIPAA in the United States. No matter what branch you are serving in, your medical information is open not just to you and your doctor. It is also open to personal personnel in your chain of command. Where other soldiers could read your medical information†¦show more content†¦But if you are in the military, it does not matter what branch you are serving in. You are not covered under the HIPAA federal Act of 1996. Your medical information can be seen by other people, not just you and your doctor. Your First Sergeant and company commander can look at your medical records to see why you are on certain restrictions and/or if you are mission capable. Law enforcement can look at your medical records without a warrant for their purposes, and you also have other military personnel who have access to your medical information to see if you should be promoted and if you can go to a specialty school (special force, military covert intelligence, or missions that will put a strain on a soldier’s body). A soldier is covered under HIPAA DoD Health Information Privacy Regulation DoD 6025.18-R. This is a form of HIPPA and is very close to the HIPAA Act of 1996 when it comes to its rules and regulations. When it comes to disclosure for law enforcement purposes, the military could disclose the soldier’s medical information for lawful purposes. It If a soldier is going to a specialized government function (specialize school, promotion schools ). The military needs to look at a soldiers medical records to make a PHA (physical and or mental health assessment) to see if they are mission ready or mission capable. . It is open to your First Sergeant, company commander, and several other members in the military to have access

Globalization of Healthcare free essay sample

However, one could draw conclusion, using Hill, Charles W. L. (2011), that several mitigating factors have enabled not only the globalization of marketable production-based goods, but also of service-related industries such as legal services and using medical diagnostics as well as surgical procedures; the case makes a compelling, if somewhat incomplete, case for globalization based upon factors such as cost reduction and improved quality of care; however, further research supports the case study’s findings. Facilitating Developments Factors such as a perceived shortage of qualified cardiologists to meet a rising demand for services is a possible explanation. Although, in the Time Magazine article by Brill, Steven (2013, March 4), he exposed the widespread practice of ordering medically unnecessary CT scans. Statistics show that the use of CT scans alone has more than quadrupled in recent decades, many times to ward off a possible malpractice lawsuit, but oftentimes to drive up profits. The demand for more skilled physicians to interpret results may be genuine, yet it is exacerbated by profit-driven hospitals eager to pay for expensive equipment within a short time. As surmised by Hill, Charles W. L. (2011), making much-needed care more accessible and affordable certainly makes outsourcing to less costly, but equally skilled, physicians in Mexico, India, and Singapore more attractive. Additionally, escalating costs of health care in the U. S. (driven mainly by hospital / pharmaceutical profits as our country’s sixth largest economy), nd technological innovations, which would allow efficient use of â€Å"outsourcing,† both contribute to the globalization of health care. As stated by Hill, Charles W. L. (2011), the assigned case cites U. S. surgical costs in the hundreds of thousands for surgeries such as hip and bypass surgeries while those same surgeries, with travel expenses included, cost much less when outsourced. Furthermore, technological advancements in the past several decades have greatly increased efficiencies with immense cost-saving and life-saving benefits. Per Hill, Charles W. L. (2011), a great argument can be made for outsourcing diagnostics to the other side of the world; while American doctors are asleep, Indian counterparts can be hard at work interpreting films or CTs, readying the results for swift treatment the next day. One of the most important factors supporting globalization, however, is the pushback of insurance companies and uninsured / underinsured consumers in an effort to reign in costs and create a more competitive health care economy. In a Time Magazine article by Brill, Steven (2013, March 4, the investigative journalist and author published several startling facts: Americans pay more per person for health care than Denmark, Australia, Japan, and Spain, yet our life expectancy is lower; we are number 50th in infant mortality, and 69% of American citizens who’ve experienced medically-related bankruptcy â€Å"were insured at the time of their filing,† meaning insurance failed to protect other valuable assets in a time of major illness or injury (p. 29). I surmised from Hill, Charles W. L. (2011) that it is no wonder that American employers, together with large insurance carriers such as Aetna, now encourage its health insurance customers to seek treatment abroad in order to reduce costs. Who Benefits? Who Loses? Given the spiraling costs of U. S. healthcare, many entities seek to benefit. Americans currently insured or underinsured will be encouraged by insurance carriers to seek treatment abroad to reduce costs, thereby saving potential out-of-pocket expenses once an insurance cap has been reached, reducing medical bankruptcy. American businesses may be able to take advantage of premium reductions offered by insurance companies should their employees agree to globalized care for major medical procedures or serious conditions which require single treatments or procedures; follow-up could be maintained in stateside facilities while the bulk of surgical procedure costs are reduced without sacrificing quality of care. Employees receiving better care will be a more productive asset to their employers. U. S. mployers, citizens, and insurance companies all stand something to gain, but it should also be noted that developing countries will also benefit; an increasing demand for their services will not only assist in honing their skills, but will also bolster their country’s economy, standard of living, and GDP. Other developing countries will also benefit as they will have more medical options as well as training centers to foster their own medical communities, thereby improving world health. The largest potential losers are still the uninsured with no obvious means to pay for out-of-pocket procedures, in spite of deep discounts. The case, Hill, Charles W. L. (2011), makes a vague reference to â€Å"recent legislation†, which one can assume refers to the â€Å"Affordable Care Act,† designed to bring coverage to millions more uninsured; however, affordability will still be an issue for privately insured/underinsured patients, according to Steven Brill, who exposed the â€Å"Chargemaster,† a driving force behind escalating healthcare costs in the U. S. It is an exhaustive list at each U. S. hospital, a listing of hospital services and corresponding charges, each charge bearing no relation to actual costs; every hospital sets the prices of its own Chargemaster; no hospital’s pricing schedule resembles that of another, nor do they seem to be based on anything objective, such as actual cost According to Brill, Steven (2013, March 4). hospitals, non-profit ones especially, have built in astronomic profits for basic procedures, laboratory tests, and have been caught padding bills which Medicare would never pay, but which are still submitted to insurance companies and private citizens after receiving treatment† (p. 22). As concluded by Brill, Steven (2013, March 4), because there is no current legislative oversight reducing what hospitals can charge those who aren’t on government-subsidized healthcare, hospitals do not participate in free-market, capitalized-based competition with one another, nor are they transpar ent about the basis for their charges. For these reasons, hospitals themselves stand to lose a great deal; they could see their profits erode as more savvy insurance agencies, employers, and citizens seek out a global market which is competitive and fair. Risks of Health Care Globalization One obvious risk of globalization is to the U. S. health care market and the arrogance fostered by the lack of regulation. Once again, U. S. hospitals are not transparent about how charges are determined as they bear little relation to actual costs. For example, according to Brill, Steven (2013, March 4), excerpts were used from actual hospital invoices; free from price regulations, patients are routinely charged $18 each for diabetes test strips (consumers can purchase for 55 cents each), $24 for a niacin tablet (in drug stores for about a nickel a piece) and CT scans for $6,538 (Medicare would pay that same hospital $825 for three scans based on actual costs). As stated by Hill, Charles W. L. (2011): Should U. S. hospitals be required to reign in domestic costs and succumb to regulation to remain competitive globally? Or do we hope that globalization alone levels the playing field? If they outsource services to India or Singapore for diagnostics, would U. S. hospitals or physicians ethically pass on those cost savings to patients or insurers? Or simply pad their profit margins? And although the text does assert studies which demonstrate quality care is already available in Mexico, India, and Singapore. (p. 42) There are dangers inherent in rapidly expanding where U. S. insurers send patients; subpar facilities may be utilized in order to curb costs; regulation and oversight must be included to facilitate safe, responsible implementation of health care, both home and abroad. Is Globalization Worthwhile? For many reasons previously discussed, globalization of healthcare, with proper oversight and some crucial regulation, is a breakthrough. No longer would patients or insurance companies (only Medicare is immune) be forced to pay exorbitant â€Å"Chargemaster† rates for U. S. healthcare, which has already been proven to be lacking in many areas. No longer would patients view treatment options as limited by geography; the increasing hospital conglomerates in the U. S. which are systematically reducing competition, would have genuine global competition. For the first time since Medicare’s inception, there’s a genuine opportunity to stem the tide of skyrocketing medical costs, increase care efficiency, and foster real competition for complacent domestic health care providers who’ve long viewed their services as geographical monopolies: for too long health care has been exclusive to an area, much like utilities such as water and pow er, but without any legislative oversight necessary to protect the American people from abusive costs. As asserted in the expansive article by, Brill, Steven (2013, March 4). , â€Å"if you are confused by the notion that those least able to pay are the ones singled out to pay the highest rates, welcome to the American medical marketplace† (p. 22). Globalized health care may be the cure for what ails us. References Brill, Steven (2013, March 4). Bitter Pill: How outrageous pricing and egregious profits are destroying our health care. Times, 181, 16-55. Hill, Charles W. L. (2011). International Business (9th Edition). McGraw Hill Irwin.